A member of Indian Women Football Team died when drowned in water Australian beach. Is it to be seen mere an accident?
Whether
it is a sudden occurred accident on which, expressing a grief, let it be said,
'to be careful in future'? Or what had happened there is correct let it be
assumed??
It
is noticeable that a few children(teenage girls) under-18 Pacific School Games Championship
held in city Adelaide Australia were on beach wandering at Glenelg.
5
Indian children were very close to sea water and a sudden surge of wave came at
seashore; then it ebbed and took them all in. As soon the people could
understand, 5 of them were drowning. It was a narrow escape when divers rescued
4 children(girls) there, but one of them drowned and her body was recovered next day. Another teenage girl’s condition has been reported to be serious.
The
question is here: when 4000 children had been invited from different countries
in the Pacific School Games, who were responsible for their care taking,
security and monitoring?
A crew of 120
players from India had gone to Adelaide for this purpose.
This can be well
contemplated of official laxity that they were handed over the responsibility
of all the children; but they were busy to wander with his family somewhere
else in Australia
Now the question
is here which rules confer the officers to allow them to take their families with these children in the school sports championship.
If the officers
had performed their duties to care these children instead of wandering, there
would not have died a baby and other children also would not have been in danger.
It is stunning
that two boys had drowned in the year 2016 during the New Year celebration at
Glenelg. It was not first incident there during Pacific School Games.
Indian Girls
Hockey Team which had gone in Australia earlier reported many inconvenience
there.
If the players'
complaint was that of edible food and that of taxi for taking them to the
field had not been arranged; this can be well understood that the organizers were
how much sensible for the participants
An important
fact is that Pacific School Games had been organized with the joint work of
Australian government and Australian Schools Sports while the Federation of
International School Sports had not given recognition to these sports.
The question is
here if the 4000 children from different countries had been participated, which
agencies had them allowed to send there. If any agency had them carried
there, that agency cannot ignore its responsibility from the security of these
children; consequently the responsibility should be fixed to that agency.
